ReversePath
Start the free check
Industry guide

DPDP for schools, colleges and coaching

Most of the people a school serves are children, and the Act treats children’s data with its strictest rules. Anyone under 18 is a child. A school also holds data about parents, teachers and visiting faculty, and runs an ERP, a learning platform, EdTech apps, biometric attendance and CCTV, each of which brings children’s data into another system.

Written for: Schools, colleges and universities, coaching and test-preparation centres, pre-schools and day care, and EdTech platforms used by them.

66 common controls, and 46 questions written for schools and colleges. Free; your answers stay in your browser.

01Why DPDP is different here

Verifiable parental consent, and what may not be done at all

Before processing a child’s personal data you need verifiable consent from a parent or lawful guardian (s. 9(1)). The Rules describe how to check that the person consenting is an adult who is the parent, for example using details you already hold reliably or an identity token from an authorised source such as DigiLocker.

Separately, you must not track children, monitor their behaviour, or direct targeted advertising at them (s. 9(3)), and must not process their data in a way likely to harm their well-being. This applies to every app and platform you put in front of students, whoever built it.

The Rules exempt educational institutions from some of these requirements for specific purposes: tracking and behavioural monitoring for educational activities and in the interests of children’s safety. The exemption covers those purposes only. A learning app that profiles students to sell them courses is outside it. Under legal review: The scope of the Fourth Schedule exemption for educational institutions, and whether it extends to an EdTech provider acting for the school, should be confirmed.

Students turn 18 during college. From then on the student, not the parent, is the Data Principal who consents and makes requests.

Needs parental consent
Admission records, photographs used publicly, learning-app accounts not covered by an exemption.
Never for children
Targeted advertising, and tracking or behavioural monitoring outside the exempt purposes.
At 18
The student takes over consent and requests from the parent.
02Who is who

The three roles, in a worked case

The Act gives three roles. The Data Principal is the person the data is about. The Data Fiduciary decides why and how it is used, and carries the duties. A Data Processor handles it on the fiduciary’s behalf, under a contract. The same business can be a fiduciary for some data and a processor for other data.

The case

Ananya, aged 11, studies at a private school. The school keeps records in a school ERP, sets homework on a learning platform, uses a third-party EdTech app for maths practice, takes biometric attendance, and runs buses through a transport contractor.

Roles under the DPDP Act in this case
Role under the ActIn this case
Data Principal
the person the data is about (s. 2(j))
Ananya. Because she is a child, her parent or guardian consents on her behalf and exercises her rights. Her teachers are Data Principals for their own staff records and attendance.
Data Fiduciary
decides why and how data is used (s. 2(i))
The school, which decides why her data is collected and used.
Data Processor
processes it on the fiduciary’s behalf (s. 2(k))
The ERP and learning-platform providers, the biometric device vendor and, where it acts on the school’s instructions, the transport contractor.

If the maths app uses Ananya’s activity to recommend paid courses or show adverts, it is deciding its own purpose and becomes a fiduciary, and targeted advertising at a child is prohibited outright. Under legal review: Whether course recommendations amount to targeted advertising under s. 9(3) depends on the facts.

03Typical data flows

What a school or college holds, and where it goes

Personal data typically held
Kind of dataExamples
Student recordsName, date of birth, photographs, address, ID numbers such as APAAR or Aadhaar, admission forms
Attendance and examinationsDaily attendance, biometric templates, marks, answer scripts, proctoring recordings, report cards
Learning activityLMS submissions, EdTech app activity, online class recordings
SensitiveHealth conditions, disabilities, counselling notes, disciplinary records, fee concessions
Parents and guardiansNames, phone numbers, occupations, income documents for fee waivers, who may collect the child
Faculty and staffTeacher records, qualifications, salary, ID and police verification, visiting faculty contracts
Visual and locationCCTV, bus GPS and cameras, event photographs

Where it comes in

Each is a point where consent may be asked for; where it is, a notice must come with it or before it (s. 5).

  • Admission and enquiry forms
  • School ERP and parent portal
  • LMS and EdTech apps
  • Biometric attendance devices
  • Examinations, online tests and proctoring
  • Transport, CCTV and visitor registers

Where it goes

Typical data flows
FromToWhat and why
ParentSchool office and ERPAdmission form and documents
School ERPLMS and EdTech appsStudent roster and class lists to create accounts
Biometric devicesAttendance systemTemplates and attendance marks for students and staff
SchoolBoard, university or national portalsEnrolment, examination and academic ID data the rules require
SchoolTransport contractorNames, addresses and parent numbers for routes; live bus location back to parents
TeachersParent groups and messagingNotices, marks and photographs, often with names
04Common risk areas

Where schools and colleges are most exposed

Common risk areas
SeverityRiskWhy it matters
CriticalNo verifiable parental consentRequired before processing a child’s data (s. 9(1)), unless an exemption in the Rules applies.
CriticalApps that track or target advertising at studentsProhibited for children regardless of consent (s. 9(3)).
HighMarks and ranks published with namesShared beyond those who need them, often in parent groups or on notice boards.
HighStudent data on teachers’ personal phonesData the school cannot control, recover or delete.
HighBiometric images stored instead of templatesRaw fingerprints or faces of children kept by a device vendor with no terms.
MediumCCTV and bus cameras with no rulesFootage of children viewable by anyone with the password.
MediumFormer students’ and applicants’ records kept indefinitelyKept long after any record the board requires.

Severity follows the same rules as the assessment; your own result sets it from your answers. How severity is set.

05Vendors and processors

Who else handles the data

You answer for what your processors do with the data (s. 8(1)), and you need a valid contract with each (s. 8(2)). Some vendors are fiduciaries in their own right; the table says where that is common.

Typical vendors and processors
VendorData they handleWhat the contract should cover
School ERP and parent portalAdmissions, fees, marks, attendanceAccess by role; hosting; breach notice; deletion when you leave
LMS and EdTech providersStudent accounts, work, activityNo tracking, profiling or advertising; deletion at year end; approved before use
Biometric attendance vendorsTemplates of students and staffTemplates, not images; stored on the device or by you; an alternative for those who decline
Online examination and proctoringRecordings, ID checks, resultsStudents told what is recorded; deletion after results and appeals
Transport and GPS providersAddresses, routes, live location, bus camera footageLocation shown only to the route’s parents; short retention
Photographers and event vendorsPhotographs of childrenUse only for the school; no publication without consent
06What ReversePath checks

46 controls written for schools and colleges, on top of 66 common ones

Alongside the common controls, the education assessment asks about children and the systems around them: verifiable parental consent and the institution exemption, EdTech approval and tracking settings, marks and attendance, examinations and proctoring, biometric attendance, CCTV and bus location, teachers’ phones and parent groups, faculty records, and how long student and applicant records are kept.

Sector controls by module
ModuleWhat is checked
Organisation and role mapping
  • Roles agreed with ERP, LMS and EdTech providers
  • Students, parents, applicants, alumni and staff all identified
Data inventory and purpose
  • Admission form asks only what admission and the law need
  • Old registers, retired ERPs and teachers' drives found
Notice and transparency
  • Admission notice covers ERP, apps, transport and photographs
  • CCTV signposted, restricted and overwritten
  • Proctoring explained, limited and deleted
Consent and lawful basis
  • Student photographs and videos used for publicity only with consent
  • Teachers' data used for employment, and other uses with consent
  • Admission leads obtained and contacted lawfully
Data Principal rights
  • Right person exercises rights for each student
  • Corrections to student records made through a controlled process
Children and guardians
  • Verifiable parental consent at admission
  • Learning apps free of tracking and advertising
  • Educational exemption used only for education and safety
  • No processing likely to harm a child's well-being
Data quality
  • Marks and attendance checked before decisions
  • Data sent to boards, universities and scholarship portals checked
Retention and deletion
  • Former students' records deleted on schedule
  • Unsuccessful applicants' data deleted after admissions
  • Answer scripts and entrance tests destroyed on time
  • Lab computers, tablets and old devices wiped
Security safeguards
  • Student data off teachers' personal phones
  • Student records encrypted and identity numbers masked
  • Health, counselling and special needs records kept separate
  • Biometric data limited, protected and deleted
  • Bus location and camera data shared only with the right parents
Breach response
  • Wrongly sent results and messages treated as breaches
Processors and vendors
  • Written terms with school vendors
  • EdTech contracts cover breach notice, own use and exit
  • Apps approved before teachers use them with students
Data sharing and disclosure
  • Marks and ranks not published with names
  • No sharing with partners for their own use without consent
  • Log of records released outside the institution
  • Requests from police, child welfare bodies and courts handled by procedure
  • Parent groups do not expose numbers or individual children
Transfer and storage location
  • Storage location of ERP, LMS and email known
  • Overseas partners and platforms checked
Records and evidence
  • Consents and releases kept against each student
Access control
  • ERP access set by role
  • Accounts removed when teachers leave and students graduate
  • Two-step sign-in for ERP administration and email
  • Parent portal shows only the family's own data
  • Students kept out of staff systems on campus devices
Incident testing
  • ERP access reviewed each term
Policy and training
  • Written policy for teachers on phones, photographs and apps

Each control is weighted by how critical it is and tied to the section of the Act or rule behind it. How results work.

07Example questions

Six of the questions you will be asked

Questions ask what you actually do, not whether you have a policy. Each answer maps to one control.

  1. EDU-01 Critical

    At admission, do you take verifiable consent from a parent or guardian before recording a child's details, beyond what any exemption for educational institutions covers?

    Answers: Yes, Partly, No, Not sure · “Yes” means: Verifiable consent recorded at admission.

    Why it is asked: A child's data needs verifiable consent from a parent. The exemption for educational institutions covers only tracking and behavioural monitoring for educational activities or safety, not admission records in general.

  2. EDU-02 Critical

    Have you checked that the learning apps and platforms your students use do not track them, profile their behaviour or show them targeted advertising?

    Answers: Yes, Partly, No, Not sure · “Yes” means: Checked for every app.

    Why it is asked: Tracking, behavioural monitoring and targeted advertising directed at children are prohibited. An institution's own monitoring for educational activities or safety is exempt; targeted advertising never is.

  3. EDU-38 Medium

    Must an app or website be approved before teachers sign students up to it, with its data use checked first?

    Answers: Yes, Partly, No, Not sure · “Yes” means: Approval is required and recorded.

    Why it is asked: A free app chosen by one teacher can collect a whole class's data with no contract and no check.

  4. EDU-47 High

    Is biometric data used only for attendance or access, stored as protected templates rather than images, with an alternative available, and deleted when people leave?

    Answers: Yes, Partly, No, Not sure · “Yes” means: All four are in place.

    Why it is asked: A fingerprint cannot be changed once leaked. Consent to biometrics must be free, which needs an alternative; for staff, where employment is the basis, an alternative remains good practice.

  5. EDU-03 High

    Do you avoid publishing marks, ranks or attendance with students' names beyond the people who need to see them?

    Answers: Yes, Partly, No, Not sure · “Yes” means: Results go only to each student and family.

    Why it is asked: Publishing marks with names discloses data beyond its purpose. Toppers' results in advertising need consent.

  6. EDU-49 High

    Before a proctored exam, are students told what is recorded and who reviews it, and are recordings deleted once results and appeals are final?

    Answers: Yes, Partly, No, Not sure · “Yes” means: Told in advance; deleted on schedule.

    Why it is asked: Proctoring captures video of students' homes. A notice and a short retention period keep it proportionate.

All 46 questions written for schools and colleges
  1. EDU-08 For your school ERP, learning platform and EdTech tools, have you agreed in writing who decides how student data is used, and whether the provider may use it for anything of its own? Organisation and role mapping
  2. EDU-09 Have you identified every group whose data you hold: students, parents and guardians, applicants, alumni, teachers and visiting faculty, drivers and attendants, and visitors? Organisation and role mapping
  3. EDU-10 Does your admission form leave out details you do not need, such as parents' income, occupation, religion or caste, unless a fee concession, reservation or legal return requires them? Data inventory and purpose
  4. EDU-11 Do you know where old student data sits: paper admission registers, retired ERP systems, old exam records and personal drives used by teachers? Data inventory and purpose
  5. EDU-13 At admission, are parents (and adult students) told what data you collect and why, including the ERP, learning apps, transport tracking and photographs you will use? Notice and transparency
  6. EDU-15 Are photographs and videos of students used on your website, social media, prospectus or hoardings only with a separate consent (from a parent where the student is a child), which can be withdrawn? Consent and lawful basis
  7. EDU-16 Is teachers' and staff data used only for employment, with profiles, photographs or results used in advertising only with each person's consent? Consent and lawful basis
  8. EDU-17 Are prospective students and parents contacted only when they enquired themselves or agreed, and never from bought or exchanged lead lists? Consent and lawful basis
  9. EDU-18 Do you know who may make requests about a student: the parent or guardian for a child, the student once 18, and what you do when separated parents disagree? Data Principal rights
  10. EDU-19 Can students and parents have personal details corrected, with changes to marks or certificates made through an approved process that keeps the original visible? Data Principal rights
  11. EDU-01 At admission, do you take verifiable consent from a parent or guardian before recording a child's details, beyond what any exemption for educational institutions covers? Children and guardians
  12. EDU-02 Have you checked that the learning apps and platforms your students use do not track them, profile their behaviour or show them targeted advertising? Children and guardians
  13. EDU-20 Where you rely on the exemption for educational institutions, is tracking and behavioural monitoring of children limited to educational activities and their safety? Children and guardians
  14. EDU-21 Do you avoid uses of children's data likely to harm them, such as displaying disciplinary records, counselling notes, health conditions or "weak student" labels where other students and parents can see them? Children and guardians
  15. EDU-22 Before marks, attendance or assessment data are used to decide promotion, detention, eligibility or scholarships, are they checked, with a route for the student to challenge errors? Data quality
  16. EDU-23 Is data you upload to boards, universities, scholarship portals and national academic systems checked first, with corrections passed on? Data quality
  17. EDU-07 Do you have a rule for how long records of former students are kept, and delete them when that period ends? Retention and deletion
  18. EDU-24 Is the data of applicants who did not join deleted once the admissions cycle and any appeal period end? Retention and deletion
  19. EDU-25 Are answer scripts, entrance test papers and evaluation records destroyed when the period your board or university sets ends? Retention and deletion
  20. EDU-26 Are lab computers, tablets, teachers' laptops and attendance devices wiped before disposal, return or repair? Retention and deletion
  21. EDU-06 Do teachers avoid keeping student data on personal phones and in personal WhatsApp groups? Security safeguards
  22. EDU-27 Are student records in the ERP, its backups and exported spreadsheets encrypted, with Aadhaar and other identity numbers masked? Security safeguards
  23. EDU-28 Are students' health, counselling, disability and special needs records kept separately, open only to the staff who support those students? Security safeguards
  24. EDU-36 When results, fee details or messages about a child are sent to the wrong parent or posted to the wrong group, is it logged as an incident and notified to the Board and the families affected? Breach response
  25. EDU-05 Are transport operators, fee-collection services and other vendors who receive student data bound by written data terms? Processors and vendors
  26. EDU-37 Do your ERP, LMS and EdTech contracts require immediate breach notice, forbid the provider using student data for its own purposes, and require return and deletion when you leave? Processors and vendors
  27. EDU-38 Must an app or website be approved before teachers sign students up to it, with its data use checked first? Processors and vendors
  28. EDU-03 Do you avoid publishing marks, ranks or attendance with students' names beyond the people who need to see them? Data sharing and disclosure
  29. EDU-39 Is student or parent data shared with partners for their own use (coaching tie-ups, banks, insurers, photographers, sponsors) only with consent and stated in your notice? Data sharing and disclosure
  30. EDU-40 Do you log each release of student records: transfer certificates, records sent to other schools or universities, and data given to scholarship bodies? Data sharing and disclosure
  31. EDU-41 Are requests for student data from police, child welfare bodies and courts checked by a named person, limited to what is required, and logged? Data sharing and disclosure
  32. EDU-42 Do you communicate with parents through a channel that does not show every parent's number to the whole class, and avoid discussing individual children in group messages? Data sharing and disclosure
  33. EDU-43 Do you know where your ERP, learning platform, email and cloud storage keep student data, including backups? Transfer and storage location
  34. EDU-44 Where student data goes abroad (foreign university partners, exchange programmes, overseas platforms), have the transfers been checked against any government restriction? Transfer and storage location
  35. EDU-45 Do you keep parental consents, publicity consents and release records so you can show, for any student, what was agreed and what was shared? Records and evidence
  36. EDU-30 In your ERP, can class teachers see only their classes, and are fee, health and disciplinary records limited to the staff who handle them? Access control
  37. EDU-31 Are accounts of teachers, visiting faculty and interns removed when they leave, and student accounts closed or converted after they graduate? Access control
  38. EDU-32 Is two-step sign-in required for ERP administrators, the principal, the accounts team and institutional email? Access control
  39. EDU-33 Does your parent or student portal show each family only its own children, with identity checked before a login or password is reset? Access control
  40. EDU-34 On shared lab computers and campus Wi-Fi, are students kept out of staff systems, with staff logins never saved on shared devices? Access control
  41. EDU-35 Do you review who has access to student records at the start of each term, and remove access that is no longer needed? Incident testing
  42. EDU-46 Is there a written policy for teachers covering photographing students, parent groups, personal phones and signing students up to apps? Policy and training
  43. EDU-04 Is CCTV on campus signposted, with access to footage limited and a set period after which it is deleted? Notice and transparency
  44. EDU-49 Before a proctored exam, are students told what is recorded and who reviews it, and are recordings deleted once results and appeals are final? Notice and transparency
  45. EDU-47 Is biometric data used only for attendance or access, stored as protected templates rather than images, with an alternative available, and deleted when people leave? Security safeguards
  46. EDU-48 Is live bus location shown only to parents of children on that route, with location history and bus camera footage kept for a set short period? Security safeguards
08Evidence

Evidence that may be asked for

A “yes” is self-declared until something shows it. These are the documents and records that usually do. Your own result lists what each control needs.

  • Admission form with the notice and parental consent section
  • Method used to verify that the consenting adult is the parent
  • List of every app and platform used with students, with the check of tracking and advertising settings
  • ERP, LMS and EdTech contracts, with clauses on breach notice and no reuse of student data
  • Biometric attendance settings showing templates, not images, and the alternative offered
  • Policy on photographs, personal phones and parent groups, with staff acknowledgement
  • CCTV signage, named viewers and the overwrite period
  • Retention schedule for student, applicant, examination and faculty records

What makes evidence good enough · How the Evidence Room keeps it

09Typical remediation

First actions, in the order they usually make sense

  1. List every app used with students and switch off tracking and advertising

    Now

  2. Stop publishing marks and ranks with names outside the class and parents

    Now

  3. Add verifiable parental consent to admission

    Before 13 May 2027

  4. Require approval before any new EdTech tool is used with students

    Before 13 May 2027

  5. Move class communication to a school-controlled channel

    Before 13 May 2027

  6. Sign data terms with ERP, LMS, biometric, transport and fee vendors

    Before 13 May 2027

  7. Brief teachers each year on children’s data

    Ongoing, yearly

Your own result orders these by your answers and the law’s dates. How to plan remediation.

10Report output

The reports a school or college usually needs

In education the result goes to the management committee or trust, and it helps answer parents who ask what happens to their children’s data.

Relevant reports
ReportWho reads itWhat it shows
Executive and Board SummaryThe management committee, trust or governing bodyWhere the institution stands on children’s data in particular, and what must change before 13 May 2027.
Remediation ReportThe principal, administrator and IT in-chargeEach gap as a task, from the admission form to the EdTech approval rule.
DPDP Vendor Readiness PackEdTech and ERP providers, read the other way roundUse it as the list of questions to put to every provider before renewing its contract.

Every report states whether the result is Self-Assessed, Evidence-Supported or Expert-Verified. None is a certificate or a statement of compliance. All six reports.

11Start

Start the education readiness check

The 46 questions above, plus the common ones, answered in your browser. You see your gaps, their severity and your first actions straight away. It is free and needs no account.

References

The law behind the education controls

Every section of the Act and rule of the Rules that the education controls rely on. Read them in plain language in the DPDP Act and the DPDP Rules guides, or in the official text linked from those pages.

Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023

SectionAboutParts cited
s. 2 Definitions s. 2(i) s. 2(j) s. 2(k)
s. 4 Grounds for processing s. 4(1)
s. 5 Notice s. 5(1) s. 5(1)(i)
s. 6 Consent s. 6(1) s. 6(4) s. 6(10)
s. 7 Certain legitimate uses s. 7(d) s. 7(e) s. 7(i)
s. 8 General duties of the Data Fiduciary s. 8(1) s. 8(2) s. 8(3)(a) s. 8(3)(b) s. 8(4) s. 8(5) s. 8(6) s. 8(7)(a) s. 8(7)(b)
s. 9 Children's data s. 9(1) s. 9(2) s. 9(3) s. 9(4)
s. 11 Right to information s. 11(1) s. 11(1)(b)
s. 12 Right to correction and erasure s. 12(1) s. 12(2)
s. 16 Transfer outside India s. 16(1) s. 16(2)
s. 17 Exemptions s. 17(1)(c)

Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025

RuleAboutParts cited
r. 3 Notice r. 3
r. 6 Reasonable security safeguards r. 6(1)(a) r. 6(1)(b) r. 6(1)(c) r. 6(1)(f) r. 6(1)(g)
r. 7 Breach intimation r. 7(1) r. 7(2) r. 7(2)(b)
r. 10 Verifiable consent for children r. 10(1)
r. 12 Exemptions for children's data r. 12(1) r. 12(2)
r. 14 Rights of Data Principals r. 14(1)
r. 15 Transfer outside India r. 15

Content version 2026.10-bank.3. Draft guidance awaiting review by a qualified data-protection lawyer; statements marked “Under legal review” are still being confirmed. Other laws are referred to in general terms. Not legal advice.